Every comparison below assumes each brand is connected on the same networks. This is what is actually connected right now.
| Brand | Networks | Profiles | Days on record | Latest day |
|---|
| Brand | Posts | Boosted | Share boosted | Amplification | Measured on |
|---|
| Brand | Posts | Share of posts | Share of interaction | Efficiency |
|---|
| Brand | Format | Posts | Median | Lift vs own median |
|---|
Lift compares a format's median against the same brand's median across all formats, so a small account and a large one can be read on the same scale.
Tables, ad-state derivation and creative scoring are in place and waiting on ingestion.
Source: Fanpage Karma → intel.profile_daily for the audience section and
intel.post for the content section. Profile metrics are pulled at 04:00 Riyadh,
posts at 04:30 over a rolling 14-day window so late engagement is captured, derivation at 05:00.
Every counter is the difference between two days and every rate is computed from the brand's own
totals — the vendor returns those as window aggregates that change size with the range requested,
so they cannot be read per day.
A post counts as boosted when paid delivery is the majority of its impressions, or when TikTok
flags it as a Spark Ad; boosted posts are excluded from the content section by default.
Instagram and Facebook publish that split only for profiles you hold access to, so a competitor's
boosting on those two networks cannot be seen and their figures read as fully organic — the
comparison understates you rather than flattering you. TikTok flags Spark Ads for every account.
Reach and impressions likewise exist for authorised own profiles only: a platform restriction,
not a gap in the tooling.
Creative thumbnails are served from our own copy — the vendor's CDN links are signed and expire
within a day or two, and 5% of the year's posts were already dead when first mirrored.
Created by Mahmoud Zoeir · Marketing Department, Mawarid Food Company